Promoting dialogue between scholars and the public, the Heidelberg Center for American Studies offers a wide range of informative events to its audience. In case you were unable to an event, these pages give you the opportunity to inform yourself about the main arguments and results of the debates and talks.
It explores American Transcendentalism broadly as an intellectual, social, and environmental reform movement. Professor Walls commenced her talk on the encounter of Transcendentalism and the Anthropocene with the observation that the humanities often seem stuck in the "Bristol palin dating 2019 quotes urdu." While Ralph Waldo Emerson has traditionally been regarded as a dreamer and a mystic, Professor Walls sees him as the leading thinker of his age who epitomized the connection between transcendentalism and nineteenth-century science.
His work was symbolic for the intersection of human and natural history, something we cannot ignore any longer. In the early seventeenth century, the mass deportation of Native Americans led to the rewilding of their lands and therefore a dip in carbon dioxide levels; in the late eighteenth century, they rose again after the invention of the steam engine and the beginning of the Industrial Revolution; and inthe ignition of the atom bomb changed human history as well as human habitat.
Professor Walls concluded her talk by pointing out the ambivalent relationship of American society and nature: Americans were at the same time horrified of natural disasters and attracted by the vastness of the wilderness.
He spoke on the topic of subnational environmental initiatives. In recent years, regional efforts to counter climate change have gained momentum and influenced global initiatives.
This movement started in when Mr. Secretary Untersteller closed with an outlook on the yearwhen Heidelberg will host the International Conference for Climate Action that will once again highlight the importance of cities and regions in the global fight against climate change.
Professor Hungerford also offers a free-of-charge online lecture series where she publicizes her work with Bristol palin dating 2019 quotes urdu students at Yale. She is a professor of English and dean of the humanities division at Yale University.
She is also working on a companion open-access journal called CA: A Journal of Cultural Analytics, which deals with literary scholarship that uses computational methods.
There were those amongst his readers who were persons of letters, demanding authority since they read the classics, and those who read what they liked — book lovers. They typically read what they bought.
However, what we do not read can be as telling as what we read, Professor Hungerford claimed. Phillip Roth typically ignored books on his shelf until he discovered a connection between the author and himself, leading to the book later on.
Especially in the age of the Internet, people suffer from an overload of information and texts. Inmore than 50, new novels were published in the United States alone.
Professor Hungerford offered solace: We could not listen to or read everybody who deserved our attention. Losing oneself in a story is considered the tangible company of a book — we do not feel lonely, we are in company. There is an imagined community of readers, as Abigail Williams argues in The Social Life of Books about reading as a past time in the eighteenth century.
Modernist novels, Professor Hungerford argued, made readers aware of themselves and of the possibility of introspection. Today, it is hard for scholars to curate their own reading and for teacher to curate their teaching. Amy Hungerford ended her talk by speaking about the glass classroom, created for outsiders to look in and linger. Here, humanities have become Bristol palin dating 2019 quotes urdu the classroom created a special social space in which reading becomes a shared experience.
After the talk, Professor Leypoldt invited the audience to chime in. What could stimulate students to read in a classroom, a member of the audience asked? The problem, Professor Hungerford responded, often was not the reading in school, but after graduation. Classrooms and readers in general needed multiplicity.
What did the literary scholar or well-read person have to offer to society, another member of the audience asked. Being well read was still valued, the professor said, being a connoisseur of anything was cultural capital.
The evening drew to an end and left the audience wondering, what do we not read? Professor Lizardo elaborated on the potential of dual process models from the field of sociology for the study Bristol palin dating 2019 quotes urdu trust.
This model separates thought processes into highly rational thinking on the one hand and more instinctual processes on the other. In contrast to the prevailing distinction of emotionality and rationality, the various dual process models regard both types of thinking as differently influenced by emotions and rationality.
The goal was therefore, said Professor Lizardo, to connect theoretical and philosophical ideas to concrete empirical data.
In the study of culture and individuals come to acquire it, he introduced the four categories of learning, memorizing, acting, and thinking.
According to Professor Lizardo, emotional and rational thinking manifested themselves in different ways in all four categories, and therefore culture was learned both rationally and instinctually. Professor Lizardo then elaborated on the implications of this model to the study of trust, which rested largely on the dichotomy between trust as the result of calculation and trust as the result of intuitive affection.
Here, especially the notion of calculated trust bore inherent value to the economy and the field of business management. Investigations into trust in these fields, so Professor Lizardo, often made use of three overarching approaches that studied who or what we trust, how we form trust, and what trust makes us do.
Yet, contemporary research was often unclear about the exact difference between calculated trust and trust out of affection, a distinction he termed as both inadequate and unhelpful. Professor Lizardo proposed instead to improve the categories through which trust was studied by applying the structure used in the dual process model. This would differentiate a deliberate rational trust from what he called an intuitive faith and enable researchers to investigate how people learn, memorize, act, and think about both forms.
Professor Lizardo concluded that this would potentially provide new insights into the development of intuitive faith, the form of trust technological advances and complex structures of modernity increasingly demanded from us. The volume was edited by Dr.
Gerlinde Groitl, assistant professor at the University of Regensburg, added their perspectives on matters of economy and security policies, respectively.
"Bristol palin dating 2019 quotes urdu"
The panel first presented the research questions, conceptions and theses of the book. From a historical perspective, one could reason that things had always worked out in the end, but the recent developments called for a healthy amount of skepticism, Dr.
The book discussed the origins of crises on one hand and tangible strategies to avoid them on the other. Primarily, the transatlantic community upheld security and welfare of the respective members and consequentially was a community of values.
Gerlinde Groitl had contributed an essay on security policy, Welf Werner on social policy, or, more specifically, the state of the economy. Concerning these fields
Bristol palin dating 2019 quotes urdu research, Dr. Groitl, a representative of the political school of realism, sees the transatlantic relationship as a partnership, however, according to President Trump, not an equal partnership.
Europe concentrated too much on the scandals around the president. Most Europeans believed all had been all well before he took office and transatlantic relations would return to this Bristol palin dating 2019 quotes urdu once Donald Trump leaves the White House, Dr. However, a constant estrangement had developed over decades. She backed her statement with examples such as the destitution during the Balkan Wars and the response of European politicians to George W.
The rise of China divided the U. This conflict attacked the roots of the transatlantic partnership but it was also clear that both partners could not pursue their interests apart from each other. Pertaining to this stability, Europe and the USA were used to three things: Over the course of this period differences between income and capital shrank. This changed dramatically between andwhen things returned to levels.
Society has increasingly grown apart, something even data pertaining to life expectancy and infant mortality rate attests to. The catching-up process of some countries, even if at the expense of others, could be seen as a recovery process. Migration and technical progress walked hand in hand, the HCA-director added. Yet, the job market needed highly trained employees, and a less-qualified workforce was at a high disadvantage when exposed to globalization.
This, Professor Werner said, made its members so susceptible to populism. Following these brief statements, Dr. A member of the audience addressed the fact that if the E.
Its member states had blocked each other in the past. Every country had its own perspective and problems varied; refugees in the South, Russia to the East — a strategic consensus was not in sight and security, even the military, was a neglected and difficult issue. An exciting and informative evening came to an end, leaving the audience curious about the future of the transatlantic community. Pennington Award on Professor Eddie S. The Pennington Award, which enables its recipients to work and interact with students and faculty of Heidelberg University for several weeks, represented values that the former slave and minister James W.
Pennington and Heidelberg University shared, emphasized Prof. Pennington, who escaped from slavery, took classes at Yale University, and became an ordained minister. InHeidelberg University bestowed an honorary doctorate on Pennington. In honor of Pennington and to celebrate African-American culture, history, and education, the Pennington Award is nowadays bestowed upon scholars whose work sheds light on African-American life past and present.
Throughout his career, he worked at multiple universities, including Amherst College and Harvard University, eventually joining "Bristol palin dating 2019 quotes urdu" Department of Religion at Princeton University in Professor Glaude then commenced his lecture with a critical assessment of the contemporary myth of progress surrounding the persona of Dr.
King, who had faced systemic racism in American society and encouraged his followers to peaceful resistance, had become a prominent symbol for the struggle to end racial discrimination.
Even though King was a prominent religious leader, who had consciously embedded his work into the American Christian tradition, his appeals and actions were also fundamentally political.
Professor Glaude highlighted this since he claimed that a society was quick to regard prophetic individuals like King as externally-acknowledged authorities, effectively denying itself the ability to have a similar impact.
Yet, the trajectory of prophetic work was decidedly social, Eddie Glaude argued. Analyzing King through the philosophy of John Dewey, Professor Glaude made the case that the actions of King and other individuals were nothing more and nothing less than imagining a better world and acting upon such imaginations.